Chesapeake Bay

WASHINGTON, D.C. — The Maryland congressional delegation is pushing legislation to protect and enhance the natural resources throughout Southern Maryland and the Chesapeake Bay area with new federal park and heritage designations.

Sen. Ben Cardin and Sen. Chris Van Hollen, both Democrats from Maryland, and Rep. John Sarbanes (D-Md., 3rd), have mounted a bicameral effort to form a working group that would explore designating the Chesapeake Bay region as a national recreation area. This group would be made up of lawmakers and more than 30 regional organizations.

Efforts to protect the nation’s largest estuary have been floating around for decades.

In his 1984 State of the Union Address, then-President Ronald Reagan said he regarded the Chesapeake Bay as a “productive recreational area and a special national resource.”

“Marylanders know the Chesapeake Bay is a national treasure,” Van Hollen said in a statement. “Designating a Chesapeake National Recreation Area will highlight that reality — and bring national recognition to the importance of the bay and its natural, cultural, historical, and recreational significance.”

“This is also a unique chance to bring new resources to protecting the Bay and to generate new opportunities to grow Maryland tourism and outdoor recreation,” he said.

Places designated as national recreation areas were initially spaces surrounding reservoirs. Now, the concept has expanded to offer visitors opportunities to experience more than just water-based outdoor activities.

Golden Gate Park in San Francisco is a national recreation area, an urban waterfront space that includes the former penitentiary on Alcatraz Island, the Sutro Baths ruins and the Presidio of San Francisco.

The Oregon Dunes National Recreation Area on the Oregon coast features the nation’s largest coastal sand dunes. Visitors can drive off-road vehicles, camp or bird-watch.

National recreation areas also often include significant natural and cultural elements.

Chesapeake Conservancy President and CEO Joel Dunn applauded the efforts of the lawmakers heading the project.

“A Chesapeake National Recreation Area would be a land-based, 21st century park, uniting new and existing National Park Service sites and trails, as well as partner parks, to increase public access to the bay and to create a national park-worthy visitor experience for all to enjoy,” he said in a statement.

Dunn also said a national recreation area would bring economic benefits to the bay region.

“Along with protecting natural, cultural, and historic resources and connecting people to nature, national parks have a proven, positive economic impact on surrounding local economies,” he said. “A Chesapeake National Recreation Area would strongly support the Bay region’s outdoor recreation economy, which contributes billions of dollars annually through recreation and tourism activities.”

The working group is set to collaborate in the coming months over proposed legislation that eventually would lead to creating a new Chesapeake National Recreation Area.

There are 40 designated national recreation areas nationwide and are among the most visited sites in the National Park System.

Cardin also is working with House Majority Leader Steny Hoyer (D-Md., 5th) on legislation that would designate portions of four counties — St. Mary’s, Calvert, Charles and Prince George’s — as a new national heritage area.

The goal would be to “further commemorate, conserve and promote important natural resources,” according to Hoyer.

National heritage areas are designated by Congress as places where natural, cultural and historic resources come together to form a cohesive, nationally important landscape, according to the National Park Service.

The heritage area entities typically collaborate with communities — in this case that would be the four Maryland counties — to determine how the area’s heritage can be made relevant to local interests and needs.

Should the Chesapeake Bay area receive formal recognition from the National Park Service, it would be federally managed. National heritage areas differ in that they typically remain in state, local or private management.

Van Hollen was an original cosponsor of the heritage legislation.

The legislation authorizes $10 million in appropriations. Of that amount, no more than $1 million would be used in any fiscal year, with a limit on the maximum federal contribution of 50% of costs associated with the heritage area.

(0) comments

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it Clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexually-oriented language.
Don't Threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be Truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be Nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be Proactive. Use the 'Report' link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with Us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.